Rewriting your article by hand is the classic approach that is slowly dissolving, however, many people still prefer so. Write manually and then rephrasing to ensure the finest quality is the safest way but it can often hours, days or weeks to finish a writing task that can otherwise take only a little time. And that’s why there also exist people who like to save the trouble and their time, so they look for an article rewriter or article spinner to do the job.
Pricing starts at just $29—a fraction of the cost of an original article. If you try Chimp Rewriter and love it, you’ll never pay for SEO content again, thanks to a very small investment that will pay for itself over and over again. What do you have to lose? Over 31,000 marketers and SEO agencies are already using Chimp Rewriter. Why aren’t you? Click below to try it risk free right now for 14 days.
For many years people used article spinners to mass produce unique content from one source article without really thinking about the quality and the human-friendly flow when it came to a real human having to read the content they landed on when visiting the website. Much more emphasis was put on producing content that was purely made to fool the search engines and rank the website accordingly.
We also often require content for link building campaigns and PBN posts. This is a whole different story as for this purpose, we need to come up with sometimes thousands of unique articles for just one campaign. If you’re using automated link building software like RankerX of GSA SER, you know that sourcing original content for your campaigns is probably the most difficult part.

You see, the same word in the English language can have different meanings depending on the context it is used in. And this is one of the main problems why content spinners don’t create the perfect human readable content we all want. The other problem is that most of us need hundreds if not thousands of variations for a single piece of content of about 1,000 words which, if spun by a theoretical article spinner that creates human readable content, won’t have that many variations – not even close.
There are lots of reviews about the product, and many people here are writers that experienced a wonderful time doing their job with the aid of the tool. Most of these people usually say that you don’t need to rely on the tool completely to get the job done because that will fail at most times. What you need to do according to the reviewers is that you should learn how to edit the article a bit so that it won’t look completely spun since there are some clients that hate this tool.
https://www.inetsolutions.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Spin-Rewriter-7.0-Honest-Review-Cutting-Edge-Cost-Effective-Content-Spinning-Software.jpg 1080 1920 root https://www.inetsolutions.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Inet-Solutions-Symbol-Plain18-80x80.png root2016-10-29 10:19:222016-10-29 10:20:00Spin Rewriter 7.0 Honest Review - Cutting-Edge & Cost-Effective Content Spinning Software
Since a content spinner can’t (yet) perceive or understand language the way a human can, it has to always check with a dictionary before replacing one word or phrase with another one similar to it. Thus, this thesaurus which is basically a dictionary of words and phrases listed by correlation to one another is the absolute most important part of a content spinning software.
!function(n,t){function r(e,n){return Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(e,n)}function i(e){return void 0===e}if(n){var o={},s=n.TraceKit,a=[].slice,u="?";o.noConflict=function(){return n.TraceKit=s,o},o.wrap=function(e){function n(){try{return e.apply(this,arguments)}catch(e){throw o.report(e),e}}return n},o.report=function(){function e(e){u(),h.push(e)}function t(e){for(var n=h.length-1;n>=0;--n)h[n]===e&&h.splice(n,1)}function i(e,n){var t=null;if(!n||o.collectWindowErrors){for(var i in h)if(r(h,i))try{h[i].apply(null,[e].concat(a.call(arguments,2)))}catch(e){t=e}if(t)throw t}}function s(e,n,t,r,s){var a=null;if(w)o.computeStackTrace.augmentStackTraceWithInitialElement(w,n,t,e),l();else if(s)a=o.computeStackTrace(s),i(a,!0);else{var u={url:n,line:t,column:r};u.func=o.computeStackTrace.guessFunctionName(u.url,u.line),u.context=o.computeStackTrace.gatherContext(u.url,u.line),a={mode:"onerror",message:e,stack:[u]},i(a,!0)}return!!f&&f.apply(this,arguments)}function u(){!0!==d&&(f=n.onerror,n.onerror=s,d=!0)}function l(){var e=w,n=p;p=null,w=null,m=null,i.apply(null,[e,!1].concat(n))}function c(e){if(w){if(m===e)return;l()}var t=o.computeStackTrace(e);throw w=t,m=e,p=a.call(arguments,1),n.setTimeout(function(){m===e&&l()},t.incomplete?2e3:0),e}var f,d,h=[],p=null,m=null,w=null;return c.subscribe=e,c.unsubscribe=t,c}(),o.computeStackTrace=function(){function e(e){if(!o.remoteFetching)return"";try{var t=function(){try{return new n.XMLHttpRequest}catch(e){return new n.ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP")}},r=t();return r.open("GET",e,!1),r.send(""),r.responseText}catch(e){return""}}function t(t){if("string"!=typeof t)return[];if(!r(j,t)){var i="",o="";try{o=n.document.domain}catch(e){}var s=/(.*)\:\/\/([^:\/]+)([:\d]*)\/{0,1}([\s\S]*)/.exec(t);s&&s[2]===o&&(i=e(t)),j[t]=i?i.split("\n"):[]}return j[t]}function s(e,n){var r,o=/function ([^(]*)\(([^)]*)\)/,s=/['"]?([0-9A-Za-z$_]+)['"]?\s*[:=]\s*(function|eval|new Function)/,a="",l=10,c=t(e);if(!c.length)return u;for(var f=0;f0?s:null}function l(e){return e.replace(/[\-\[\]{}()*+?.,\\\^$|#]/g,"\\$&")}function c(e){return l(e).replace("<","(?:<|<)").replace(">","(?:>|>)").replace("&","(?:&|&)").replace('"','(?:"|")').replace(/\s+/g,"\\s+")}function f(e,n){for(var r,i,o=0,s=n.length;or&&(i=s.exec(o[r]))?i.index:null}function h(e){if(!i(n&&n.document)){for(var t,r,o,s,a=[n.location.href],u=n.document.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=""+e,h=/^function(?:\s+([\w$]+))?\s*\(([\w\s,]*)\)\s*\{\s*(\S[\s\S]*\S)\s*\}\s*$/,p=/^function on([\w$]+)\s*\(event\)\s*\{\s*(\S[\s\S]*\S)\s*\}\s*$/,m=0;m]+)>|([^\)]+))\((.*)\))? in (.*):\s*$/i,o=n.split("\n"),u=[],l=0;l=0&&(v.line=g+x.substring(0,j).split("\n").length)}}}else if(o=d.exec(i[y])){var _=n.location.href.replace(/#.*$/,""),T=new RegExp(c(i[y+1])),E=f(T,[_]);v={url:_,func:"",args:[],line:E?E.line:o[1],column:null}}if(v){v.func||(v.func=s(v.url,v.line));var k=a(v.url,v.line),A=k?k[Math.floor(k.length/2)]:null;k&&A.replace(/^\s*/,"")===i[y+1].replace(/^\s*/,"")?v.context=k:v.context=[i[y+1]],h.push(v)}}return h.length?{mode:"multiline",name:e.name,message:i[0],stack:h}:null}function y(e,n,t,r){var i={url:n,line:t};if(i.url&&i.line){e.incomplete=!1,i.func||(i.func=s(i.url,i.line)),i.context||(i.context=a(i.url,i.line));var o=/ '([^']+)' /.exec(r);if(o&&(i.column=d(o[1],i.url,i.line)),e.stack.length>0&&e.stack[0].url===i.url){if(e.stack[0].line===i.line)return!1;if(!e.stack[0].line&&e.stack[0].func===i.func)return e.stack[0].line=i.line,e.stack[0].context=i.context,!1}return e.stack.unshift(i),e.partial=!0,!0}return e.incomplete=!0,!1}function v(e,n){for(var t,r,i,a=/function\s+([_$a-zA-Z\xA0-\uFFFF][_$a-zA-Z0-9\xA0-\uFFFF]*)?\s*\(/i,l=[],c={},f=!1,p=v.caller;p&&!f;p=p.caller)if(p!==g&&p!==o.report){if(r={url:null,func:u,args:[],line:null,column:null},p.name?r.func=p.name:(t=a.exec(p.toString()))&&(r.func=t[1]),"undefined"==typeof r.func)try{r.func=t.input.substring(0,t.input.indexOf("{"))}catch(e){}if(i=h(p)){r.url=i.url,r.line=i.line,r.func===u&&(r.func=s(r.url,r.line));var m=/ '([^']+)' /.exec(e.message||e.description);m&&(r.column=d(m[1],i.url,i.line))}c[""+p]?f=!0:c[""+p]=!0,l.push(r)}n&&l.splice(0,n);var w={mode:"callers",name:e.name,message:e.message,stack:l};return y(w,e.sourceURL||e.fileName,e.line||e.lineNumber,e.message||e.description),w}function g(e,n){var t=null;n=null==n?0:+n;try{if(t=m(e))return t}catch(e){if(x)throw e}try{if(t=p(e))return t}catch(e){if(x)throw e}try{if(t=w(e))return t}catch(e){if(x)throw e}try{if(t=v(e,n+1))return t}catch(e){if(x)throw e}return{mode:"failed"}}function b(e){e=1+(null==e?0:+e);try{throw new Error}catch(n){return g(n,e+1)}}var x=!1,j={};return g.augmentStackTraceWithInitialElement=y,g.guessFunctionName=s,g.gatherContext=a,g.ofCaller=b,g.getSource=t,g}(),o.extendToAsynchronousCallbacks=function(){var e=function(e){var t=n[e];n[e]=function(){var e=a.call(arguments),n=e[0];return"function"==typeof n&&(e[0]=o.wrap(n)),t.apply?t.apply(this,e):t(e[0],e[1])}};e("setTimeout"),e("setInterval")},o.remoteFetching||(o.remoteFetching=!0),o.collectWindowErrors||(o.collectWindowErrors=!0),(!o.linesOfContext||o.linesOfContext<1)&&(o.linesOfContext=11),void 0!==e&&e.exports&&n.module!==e?e.exports=o:"function"==typeof define&&define.amd?define("TraceKit",[],o):n.TraceKit=o}}("undefined"!=typeof window?window:global)},"./webpack-loaders/expose-loader/index.js?require!./shared/require-global.js":function(e,n,t){(function(n){e.exports=n.require=t("./shared/require-global.js")}).call(n,t("../../../lib/node_modules/webpack/buildin/global.js"))}});
Yea mate, WordAI really is overpriced IMO too, which is why I didn’t rank it higher in the cost-effectiveness rankings. Now, it did change more than a few words, but I see how you would think it’s less than 80% unique. TBS is also great, but only in terms of functionality and the easy interface which allows manual spinning to be done quite fast. As for their thesaurus, I think they have a lot to improve.
There is also the option to spin capitalized words (assumed to be proper nouns) as well as leave any number of words unchanged, depending on whatever you enter into the "ignore" field, separated by commas. You also have the option to only keep the sentences that were altered a minimum percentage, as indicated by the "Keep Sentences that Changed" option.
Very Fast Results – The main benefit that you can get with the tool is that you will be able to get very fast results when it comes to your rewrites. It’s a well known fact that this product has been updated over time to the point where it can rewrite a 500 word article into something that’s new and unique to the eyes of potential viewers within 9 seconds or less compared to the past version where it will take 2 minutes to finish rewriting.
I personally love this one. It creates amazing content and is extremely affordable. We use a combination of WordAI and Spin Rewriter for our SEO projects, because these two are just an amazing combination. I think Spin Rewriter beats the “Standard Spinner” of WordAI in terms of quality and human readability, but loses to its “Turing Spinner”. So what we do is use the “Turing Spinner” for Tier 1 projects and then Spin Rewriter for the lower tiers. Sometimes we might switch them up, but it really depends a lot on the situation.
I love EVERYTHING!!!! Spin Rewriter is extremely easy to use, and the quality is the best available on the market... PERIOD!!! Even if you are new to marketing, you know that content is a major cornerstone. We use to spend thousands of dollars having content developed. Using Spin Rewriter has cut our costs by 90%. The best part is we did not have to sacrifice quality in order to increase production.
Plagiarism is copying someone else's work (in this case, a quotation, sentence, article, review, essay, essay, etc.) and assigning it to yourself, thus concealing the real author. We divide plagiarisms into explicit, hidden, total, partial and autoplagic. Open plagiarism is one of the most common types and consists in taking over the entire work or a specific fragment and signing it with your own name. The other one is hidden plagiarism, that is, assigning a certain part of the work, not to mention its actual creator. The third type is total plagiarism, and as the name suggests, it is based on the total stealing of a given job. The fourth is partial plagiarism - in this case we are talking about assigning some elements from a given work and signing them as our own creation. The last one is autoplagiat, and it is based on copying one's own work, which has already been published earlier. Universities and schools have anti-plagiarism systems that check the originality of the work. These programs have the option of blocking or invalidating a given work, it may also lead to the person being held criminally liable. So how do you avoid this unpleasant situation? One of the methods is the synonymization and paraphrase of the text, that is, the modification of the original text while maintaining its meaning. It is most often about transferring information in your own words. But what do you do when you run out of words? Our mixer of synonyms will help in generating unique content using synonymisation, that is, converting words to others, but with the same meaning. The program is fully free and very easy to use. Paraphrase Online save time and enrich the language, they come to help whenever we struggle with how to convert a piece of text. Our program includes the best, most extensive language dictionary, and thus the synonym of almost every popular word. Thanks to the mixture of synonyms and using your own invention, you can create a new, unique text that the anti-plagiarism considers as your own.
When you integrate Perfect Tense with Spin Rewriter, Perfect Tense will check your seed article for grammatical mistakes before Spin Rewriter spins it. With higher quality seed articles, Spin Rewriter will be able to create higher quality content. In many instances, these improvements will lead to spun content that is higher quality than the original.
×