Not so long ago there lived a boy. He blue eyes with blond hair as yellow as gold. The young boy was smaller than average fragile, but his mind was swift much like the wind. He could calculate the outcome from a situation within the blink of the eye. But that was not his biggest talent. No. His biggest talent was perception. The son could understand and perceive anything quicker than anyone he’d ever met. Then, he fell crazy about a lovely princess. She’d magnetic green eyes and light brown hair. He loved her quite definitely and then she loved him back even more. There were only 1 problem – the young lad was the son of your blacksmith. The princess’s father would never allow her to marry an easy son of a blacksmith. On the other hand love was too strong. In a single fell swoop, the young boy raised an army of undead and commenced a rebellion to overthrow the evil king who didn’t trust soul mates. After months of struggling with the armies of his beloved’s father, the young lad was assassinated as well as the war was over. No songs were sang.
Yea mate, WordAI really is overpriced IMO too, which is why I didn’t rank it higher in the cost-effectiveness rankings. Now, it did change more than a few words, but I see how you would think it’s less than 80% unique. TBS is also great, but only in terms of functionality and the easy interface which allows manual spinning to be done quite fast. As for their thesaurus, I think they have a lot to improve.
To write a solid and fact filled article can take even the most educated and well rounded individual between 45 minutes and 1 hour 30 minutes to produce depending on the subject and length of article being created. This task to some people is really, really difficult especially when the search engines have greater emphasis in ranking websites with lots of useful and relevant content.
!function(n,t){function r(e,n){return Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(e,n)}function i(e){return void 0===e}if(n){var o={},s=n.TraceKit,a=[].slice,u="?";o.noConflict=function(){return n.TraceKit=s,o},o.wrap=function(e){function n(){try{return e.apply(this,arguments)}catch(e){throw o.report(e),e}}return n},o.report=function(){function e(e){u(),h.push(e)}function t(e){for(var n=h.length-1;n>=0;--n)h[n]===e&&h.splice(n,1)}function i(e,n){var t=null;if(!n||o.collectWindowErrors){for(var i in h)if(r(h,i))try{h[i].apply(null,[e].concat(a.call(arguments,2)))}catch(e){t=e}if(t)throw t}}function s(e,n,t,r,s){var a=null;if(w)o.computeStackTrace.augmentStackTraceWithInitialElement(w,n,t,e),l();else if(s)a=o.computeStackTrace(s),i(a,!0);else{var u={url:n,line:t,column:r};u.func=o.computeStackTrace.guessFunctionName(u.url,u.line),u.context=o.computeStackTrace.gatherContext(u.url,u.line),a={mode:"onerror",message:e,stack:[u]},i(a,!0)}return!!f&&f.apply(this,arguments)}function u(){!0!==d&&(f=n.onerror,n.onerror=s,d=!0)}function l(){var e=w,n=p;p=null,w=null,m=null,i.apply(null,[e,!1].concat(n))}function c(e){if(w){if(m===e)return;l()}var t=o.computeStackTrace(e);throw w=t,m=e,p=a.call(arguments,1),n.setTimeout(function(){m===e&&l()},t.incomplete?2e3:0),e}var f,d,h=[],p=null,m=null,w=null;return c.subscribe=e,c.unsubscribe=t,c}(),o.computeStackTrace=function(){function e(e){if(!o.remoteFetching)return"";try{var t=function(){try{return new n.XMLHttpRequest}catch(e){return new n.ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP")}},r=t();return r.open("GET",e,!1),r.send(""),r.responseText}catch(e){return""}}function t(t){if("string"!=typeof t)return[];if(!r(j,t)){var i="",o="";try{o=n.document.domain}catch(e){}var s=/(.*)\:\/\/([^:\/]+)([:\d]*)\/{0,1}([\s\S]*)/.exec(t);s&&s[2]===o&&(i=e(t)),j[t]=i?i.split("\n"):[]}return j[t]}function s(e,n){var r,o=/function ([^(]*)\(([^)]*)\)/,s=/['"]?([0-9A-Za-z$_]+)['"]?\s*[:=]\s*(function|eval|new Function)/,a="",l=10,c=t(e);if(!c.length)return u;for(var f=0;f0?s:null}function l(e){return e.replace(/[\-\[\]{}()*+?.,\\\^$|#]/g,"\\$&")}function c(e){return l(e).replace("<","(?:<|<)").replace(">","(?:>|>)").replace("&","(?:&|&)").replace('"','(?:"|")').replace(/\s+/g,"\\s+")}function f(e,n){for(var r,i,o=0,s=n.length;or&&(i=s.exec(o[r]))?i.index:null}function h(e){if(!i(n&&n.document)){for(var t,r,o,s,a=[n.location.href],u=n.document.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=""+e,h=/^function(?:\s+([\w$]+))?\s*\(([\w\s,]*)\)\s*\{\s*(\S[\s\S]*\S)\s*\}\s*$/,p=/^function on([\w$]+)\s*\(event\)\s*\{\s*(\S[\s\S]*\S)\s*\}\s*$/,m=0;m]+)>|([^\)]+))\((.*)\))? in (.*):\s*$/i,o=n.split("\n"),u=[],l=0;l=0&&(v.line=g+x.substring(0,j).split("\n").length)}}}else if(o=d.exec(i[y])){var _=n.location.href.replace(/#.*$/,""),T=new RegExp(c(i[y+1])),E=f(T,[_]);v={url:_,func:"",args:[],line:E?E.line:o[1],column:null}}if(v){v.func||(v.func=s(v.url,v.line));var k=a(v.url,v.line),A=k?k[Math.floor(k.length/2)]:null;k&&A.replace(/^\s*/,"")===i[y+1].replace(/^\s*/,"")?v.context=k:v.context=[i[y+1]],h.push(v)}}return h.length?{mode:"multiline",name:e.name,message:i[0],stack:h}:null}function y(e,n,t,r){var i={url:n,line:t};if(i.url&&i.line){e.incomplete=!1,i.func||(i.func=s(i.url,i.line)),i.context||(i.context=a(i.url,i.line));var o=/ '([^']+)' /.exec(r);if(o&&(i.column=d(o[1],i.url,i.line)),e.stack.length>0&&e.stack[0].url===i.url){if(e.stack[0].line===i.line)return!1;if(!e.stack[0].line&&e.stack[0].func===i.func)return e.stack[0].line=i.line,e.stack[0].context=i.context,!1}return e.stack.unshift(i),e.partial=!0,!0}return e.incomplete=!0,!1}function v(e,n){for(var t,r,i,a=/function\s+([_$a-zA-Z\xA0-\uFFFF][_$a-zA-Z0-9\xA0-\uFFFF]*)?\s*\(/i,l=[],c={},f=!1,p=v.caller;p&&!f;p=p.caller)if(p!==g&&p!==o.report){if(r={url:null,func:u,args:[],line:null,column:null},p.name?r.func=p.name:(t=a.exec(p.toString()))&&(r.func=t[1]),"undefined"==typeof r.func)try{r.func=t.input.substring(0,t.input.indexOf("{"))}catch(e){}if(i=h(p)){r.url=i.url,r.line=i.line,r.func===u&&(r.func=s(r.url,r.line));var m=/ '([^']+)' /.exec(e.message||e.description);m&&(r.column=d(m[1],i.url,i.line))}c[""+p]?f=!0:c[""+p]=!0,l.push(r)}n&&l.splice(0,n);var w={mode:"callers",name:e.name,message:e.message,stack:l};return y(w,e.sourceURL||e.fileName,e.line||e.lineNumber,e.message||e.description),w}function g(e,n){var t=null;n=null==n?0:+n;try{if(t=m(e))return t}catch(e){if(x)throw e}try{if(t=p(e))return t}catch(e){if(x)throw e}try{if(t=w(e))return t}catch(e){if(x)throw e}try{if(t=v(e,n+1))return t}catch(e){if(x)throw e}return{mode:"failed"}}function b(e){e=1+(null==e?0:+e);try{throw new Error}catch(n){return g(n,e+1)}}var x=!1,j={};return g.augmentStackTraceWithInitialElement=y,g.guessFunctionName=s,g.gatherContext=a,g.ofCaller=b,g.getSource=t,g}(),o.extendToAsynchronousCallbacks=function(){var e=function(e){var t=n[e];n[e]=function(){var e=a.call(arguments),n=e[0];return"function"==typeof n&&(e[0]=o.wrap(n)),t.apply?t.apply(this,e):t(e[0],e[1])}};e("setTimeout"),e("setInterval")},o.remoteFetching||(o.remoteFetching=!0),o.collectWindowErrors||(o.collectWindowErrors=!0),(!o.linesOfContext||o.linesOfContext<1)&&(o.linesOfContext=11),void 0!==e&&e.exports&&n.module!==e?e.exports=o:"function"==typeof define&&define.amd?define("TraceKit",[],o):n.TraceKit=o}}("undefined"!=typeof window?window:global)},"./webpack-loaders/expose-loader/index.js?require!./shared/require-global.js":function(e,n,t){(function(n){e.exports=n.require=t("./shared/require-global.js")}).call(n,t("../../../lib/node_modules/webpack/buildin/global.js"))}});
You can see from the result of the spinned article that it is indeed highly readable, though it’s not that perfectly readable and it would still require some minor edits, though not really the best article spinner out there but I think the quality of the spinned articles would already suffice for the contents of my Tier 2 and Tier 3 link building campaigns
I wanted to add some phrases in the text to see if the spinner will understand them and possibly replace them with similar phrases. As you see, this is just a simple short story that blew out of my head just a minute ago. As a final note of the intro section, I want you to understand that “thesaurus” simply means a database of words and their synonyms. Let’s see how this goes.
{During|Throughout} {a research|a research study|a study} experiment {a marine|an aquatic} biologist {placed|put|positioned} a shark {into|right into} {a large|a big|a huge} holding {tank|storage tank|container} {and then|and after that|then|and afterwards} {released|launched} {several|a number of|numerous} {small|little|tiny} {bait|lure} fish {into|right into} the {tank|storage tank|container}.
There are lots of reviews about the product, and many people here are writers that experienced a wonderful time doing their job with the aid of the tool. Most of these people usually say that you don’t need to rely on the tool completely to get the job done because that will fail at most times. What you need to do according to the reviewers is that you should learn how to edit the article a bit so that it won’t look completely spun since there are some clients that hate this tool.
When you integrate Perfect Tense with Spin Rewriter, Perfect Tense will check your seed article for grammatical mistakes before Spin Rewriter spins it. With higher quality seed articles, Spin Rewriter will be able to create higher quality content. In many instances, these improvements will lead to spun content that is higher quality than the original.

This has been my experience too. Furthermore, I do not recommend Spinrewriter because I found a major flaw. The save feature does not work so that you can finish editing your article at a later time if you choose to. So if you don’t finish spinning your article like you want it all in just one sitting, then you’re screwed because when you come back more than likely your work won’t be saved where you left off, so you then have to edit and tweak manually. This is what I’ve experienced time & time again with this flawed software. I contacted spinwriter support about this and they didn’t deny the problem or even offer to fix it. This is poor support and obvious that key features such as this do not work as advertised or as presented. Therefore, I DO NOT recommend Spinrewriter.
Spin Rewriter completely changed my mind about article spinning software. I've tried nearly every one that's come on the market (seriously) and wound up just rewriting articles myself since each product basically made me do that anyway. So when I tried Spin Rewriter, I was a little hesitant as I'm used to every product always having a huge hype with tons of testimonials from people I've never heard of. With SR 4, my mind was completely changed, and I was amazed at how easy the software was to use, but also it really focused on proper spelling and language. With many articles you see online, it's obvious it's spun as it reads like something automated and off the rails wrote it. With Spin Rewriter, it truly is able to sound real with quality writing. You have to put a little effort into it for the best results, of course, but unlike all the others it's worth that little bit of effort. I can't wait to see what changes are made for 5.0!

But still, this tool is guaranteed to be very useful, and every writer can use it whenever they wish to do some rewriting, and this tool can be educational especially if you want to learn how to revise words the right way. This is a great teacher and helper for your work, and rest assured that using this will be as easy as opening up your program for writing!
×