Only standard WordAI spinner showed 12% match for me in Copyscape which is very good I think. Also I will add that for SPAM links in general you don’t need any quality at all. if Google crawler can’t find connection with other spinned articles – goal achieved. Sorry, but I don’t see that with expensive spinners as Copyspace shows that in plain sight.
Not from my experience. If you want a free option then the Article Spinner is the best option. If you want to pay, then Spinner Chief is the best. One of the most common mistakes that a beginning website owner does is to just copy and paste the marketing materials from the pamphlets onto the website. Writing for the Web needs to be different from writing for print. The way the Web works is different from print and the writing need to reflect that.
Spin Rewriter 5.0 technology was a previous edition that allowed their clients to use the basic article rewriting system.  Their newer versions over the years have just kept getting better and better.   The new Spin Rewriter 9.0 technology gives you the option of assigning variables to your content.  Their software is dead easy to use.  In just three steps you can have up to 50 uniquely spun articles. 

Spin Rewriter 7.0 was released not long ago and I wanted to write a quick review article covering what’s new in this new version of the content spinning software. But in a few words, let’s just say that Spin Rewriter is the absolute most cost-effective article spinning tool on the market right now. I mean the quality of spun content you get for the ridiculously low price of this software is just insane. Let me show you.
Many people will outsource this task to well educated content writers and can be a pitfall when it comes to getting that quality content written for your website. This is especially true in the 'you get what you pay for' nature of the business when it comes to choosing an adequate content writer that is not only cheap but someone that also produces high quality articles which are relevant to the subject.
There are lots of reviews about the product, and many people here are writers that experienced a wonderful time doing their job with the aid of the tool. Most of these people usually say that you don’t need to rely on the tool completely to get the job done because that will fail at most times. What you need to do according to the reviewers is that you should learn how to edit the article a bit so that it won’t look completely spun since there are some clients that hate this tool.
!function(e){function n(t){if(r[t])return r[t].exports;var i=r[t]={i:t,l:!1,exports:{}};return e[t].call(i.exports,i,i.exports,n),i.l=!0,i.exports}var t=window.webpackJsonp;window.webpackJsonp=function(n,r,o){for(var s,a,u=0,l=[];u1)for(var t=1;tf)return!1;if(h>c)return!1;var e=window.require.hasModule("shared/browser")&&window.require("shared/browser");return!e||!e.opera}function a(){var e=o(d);d=[],0!==e.length&&l("/ajax/log_errors_3RD_PARTY_POST",{errors:JSON.stringify(e)})}var u=t("./third_party/tracekit.js"),l=t("./shared/basicrpc.js").rpc;u.remoteFetching=!1,u.collectWindowErrors=!0,u.report.subscribe(r);var c=10,f=window.Q&&window.Q.errorSamplingRate||1,d=[],h=0,p=i(a,1e3),m=window.console&&!(window.NODE_JS&&window.UNIT_TEST);n.report=function(e){try{m&&console.error(e.stack||e),u.report(e)}catch(e){}};var w=function(e,n,t){r({name:n,message:t,source:e,stack:u.computeStackTrace.ofCaller().stack||[]}),m&&console.error(t)};n.logJsError=w.bind(null,"js"),n.logMobileJsError=w.bind(null,"mobile_js")},"./shared/globals.js":function(e,n,t){var r=t("./shared/links.js");(window.Q=window.Q||{}).openUrl=function(e,n){var t=e.href;return r.linkClicked(t,n),window.open(t).opener=null,!1}},"./shared/links.js":function(e,n){var t=[];n.onLinkClick=function(e){t.push(e)},n.linkClicked=function(e,n){for(var r=0;r>>0;if("function"!=typeof e)throw new TypeError;for(arguments.length>1&&(t=n),r=0;r>>0,r=arguments.length>=2?arguments[1]:void 0,i=0;i>>0;if(0===i)return-1;var o=+n||0;if(Math.abs(o)===Infinity&&(o=0),o>=i)return-1;for(t=Math.max(o>=0?o:i-Math.abs(o),0);t>>0;if("function"!=typeof e)throw new TypeError(e+" is not a function");for(arguments.length>1&&(t=n),r=0;r>>0;if("function"!=typeof e)throw new TypeError(e+" is not a function");for(arguments.length>1&&(t=n),r=new Array(s),i=0;i>>0;if("function"!=typeof e)throw new TypeError;for(var r=[],i=arguments.length>=2?arguments[1]:void 0,o=0;o>>0,i=0;if(2==arguments.length)n=arguments[1];else{for(;i=r)throw new TypeError("Reduce of empty array with no initial value");n=t[i++]}for(;i>>0;if(0===i)return-1;for(n=i-1,arguments.length>1&&(n=Number(arguments[1]),n!=n?n=0:0!==n&&n!=1/0&&n!=-1/0&&(n=(n>0||-1)*Math.floor(Math.abs(n)))),t=n>=0?Math.min(n,i-1):i-Math.abs(n);t>=0;t--)if(t in r&&r[t]===e)return t;return-1};t(Array.prototype,"lastIndexOf",c)}if(!Array.prototype.includes){var f=function(e){"use strict";if(null==this)throw new TypeError("Array.prototype.includes called on null or undefined");var n=Object(this),t=parseInt(n.length,10)||0;if(0===t)return!1;var r,i=parseInt(arguments[1],10)||0;i>=0?r=i:(r=t+i)<0&&(r=0);for(var o;r

This is an asset to any company. It has increased productivity and paid for itself in the first day. We were worried about our employees being able to use it but this worry was put at ease very soon after purchasing, as it is the easiest and best Article Spinner we have ever used. We were really impressed with how well the spun articles sounded compared to other spinners where you had to go back through an basically edit the Article entirely.
We do our best to your order completed as quickly as possible. Please allow 7-14 days for your order to be completed. In some cases we may choose to send your reports as certain parts of your project are completed. If we need more information about your project we will contact you within 24 hours or purchase. Do not hesitate to send us an email if you have a question or need more information. <<
×